Home / April 2026 CBLE / Question 20

No USMCA: how should 7501 Blocks 27–34 read?

April 2026 examPractical ExerciseQuestion 20 of 80
Exhibit from CBP's April 2026 exam booklet, PDF page 10
Exhibit from CBP's published April 2026 exam (PDF page 10). Click to enlarge.
Exhibit from CBP's April 2026 exam booklet, PDF page 12
Exhibit from CBP's published April 2026 exam (PDF page 12). Click to enlarge.

In the above entry summary, if USMCA did not apply for either line number, which ONE of the choices below best represents how Blocks 27-34 should be entered for line numbers 1 and 2?

How to get there

Without USMCA, two things change. Each line takes its general (column 1) duty rate, and the merchandise processing fee (MPF) is back, because USMCA-originating goods are what was exempt from it.

1. Duty rates (HTSUS, general column)

2. The math

Only D shows all four amounts: free duty and MPF on line 1, 4.9% duty and MPF on line 2.

Why the other choices are wrong

A) Has the right duty on line 2 but no MPF at all. Without USMCA, the formal entry owes MPF.
B) Shows MPF on both lines but leaves line 2's duty as Free. 3307.30.50 is 4.9% under the general rate. "Free" here only comes from special programs, and USMCA doesn't apply.
C) Charges MPF on line 2 only. MPF is ad valorem on every line of a formal entry, including duty-free lines. Free duty doesn't mean free of MPF.
Trap!
"Free" duty ≠ no MPF. MPF exemptions come from the trade program (USMCA and other FTAs claimed with the right SPI), not from a zero duty rate. And remember the Canadian context: the original 7501 showed both lines Free with no MPF because USMCA was claimed.

Sources: HTSUS 3304.99.50, 3307.30.50 (USITC); 19 CFR 24.23 (MPF); ACE Entry Summary Instructions v2.4a (Formal MPF class code 499; "Goods originating under a Free Trade Agreement (FTA) may be exempt from MPF").

CBP answer key: Answer D · ACE Entry Summary Instructions pgs. 13-14 and 29; 19 CFR 24.23Source: CBP past exams ↗